Thursday, September 16, 2004

Down Under

I walked into the porn store tonight, and after the guy asked, “Can I help you ma’am?”, I responded with, “Yes, I’m looking for a magazine with up-close pictures of vaginas."

So, why was I in a porn store looking for a magazine with up-close pictures of vaginas? Well, I wanted to take a look at some of the different varieties that are out there...and there are definitely a variety. I have SRS approaching and I’d like to have a reference as to how they approximately look. I haven’t really seen one up close and personal...with the lights on, that is. Plus, Amber has pictures of her SRS results on her website, so I kinda wanted to compare things. It's too bad I won’t be able to see her labiaplasty results before I have my own SRS. I’ve seen another friend’s labiaplasty results, but Amber is a lot closer to my frame and size.

The guy helping me, though, leads me to the magazine racks and says that some of the “girls for girls” magazines will probably have what I am looking for. He almost seems nervous or awkward with what I’m sure is a rare appearance of a woman in his shop. He hands me a Playboy version to view, which even I know is not going to have much in the way of vagina shots. Playboy is more into boobs and being pretty than showing vaginas. Some would call them tame.

So, next I moved on to a Hustler version of “girls for girls” which was much better, but I found the best pictures in a magazine called “Just Girls” which I had never even heard of. It appears to be a UK magazine. Hooray for the Brits!!!

No comments: